What is apache license 2

Contents hide. What is the difference between the versions? Is the Apache considered copyleft? What is the difference between the Apache License 2. What is the difference between Apache License 2. How to Use Apache License 2. Can you license your own software under the Apache License? The complete guide to Open Source Licenses Subscribe to Our Blog.

This website uses 'cookies' to give you the most relevant experience. By browsing this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more about our privacy policy. Okay, thanks. I want to use SVG Edit for a project.

This software is distributed under the Apache 2 license. Do these pertain to the code or should I display the license somewhere in the GUI? And most importantly: what is the correct etiquette for doing this?

I don't want to be a jerk, but at the same time I want to simplify the UI as much as possible and removing the link will be part of it if it's not considered rude.

For software licensed under the Apache License Version 2. That license encourages modification. The license assures your freedom to remove "powered by SVG Edit" in your modified version. You are required to display its contents in a way that is appropriate to the software.

Mind you, SVG Edit probably already does this. See section 4 b of the APLv2 to better understand your options. In any case, what you want to do is not rude, especially if it makes your derivative work better. Good etiquette in using opensource software is to at least give credit where credit is due. This I think is a bare minimum. As such, Whatever you do I think it would be good practice to mention and give thanks to the different projects, libraries or developers that helped you create your system.

May it be through integrating a library, modifying a piece of code gathered somewhere or getting direct help from someone. Make your mentions and thanks in a way that is linkable for their use and give them permission to mention your project in return is even better.

What would be considered rude is to use a piece of Open-Source, make some corrections and modifications, integrate it in another system and publish this other system without ever sharing the fixes or mentioning that you used it anywhere.

Learn more. Apache 2. Asked today. Active today. Viewed 14 times. I will change package name in approx files and make more modifications in future. They have no copyright or notice file anywhere except their package. So, What exactly should I write if I have to write a notice on top of each files? Improve this question. Bart van Ingen Schenau Sign in. Log into your account. Forgot your password? Password recovery. Recover your password. Home IT. Apache License. Webopedia Staff.

August 26, Updated on: July 26, For more information on current editorial staff, please visit our About page.