Aids virus inventato di peter duesberg

Wikimedia Italia added it Dec 31, Antonella De Robbio added it Sep 05, Fabio Bucchi added it Jan 17, Gabriel Rolland added it Dec 12, Eboncimino added it Sep 15, Giulia C marked it as to-read Apr 02, Antonella De Robbio added it Jun 16, Federico Binda marked it as to-read May 11, Parizade marked it as to-read Aug 28, Nicolino Di Gaetano added it Aug 08, Gimo De Faveri is currently reading it Dec 16, Nicolino Di Gaetano added it Aug 06, Wallace Fin added it Nov 26, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.

Be the first to start one ». Readers also enjoyed. About Peter H. Peter H. Books by Peter H. When Dana Schwartz started writing about a 19th-century pandemic ravaging Edinburgh in her latest book, Anatomy: A Love Story, she had no idea Read more Il virus in No trivia or quizzes yet.

In his book he describes a phone call to the Indiana Hemophilia Foundation to inquire about the cause of child hemophiliac Ryan White's death. According to Duesberg his call revealed that "only internal bleeding and hemorrhaging, liver failure, and collapse of other physiological systems were listed. It was then acknowledged that White's hemophilia condition was more severe than the average, requiring him to take clotting factor every day near the end.

Hemophiliacs, needless to say, are particularly vulnerable to the internal ulcers induced by such chemotherapy. They have been dutifully regurgitating what government agencies have told them, rather than questioning the contradictions in the claims of the NIH and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC. While HIV is commonly called "a deadly virus" in the press, Duesberg reminds us that the length of the latency period -- the period between HIV infection and the onset of AIDS -- has been revised steadily upward in the years since the virus was discovered.

To Duesberg's continued annoyance, many in the press have selective memories. As John Moore put it, "All this ancient history is very entertaining. Osborn has to state why she's even bothering to look at the book. It's because Duesberg was elected to the National Academy of Sciences for his retroviral work.

Osborn concludes that the book is "outrageous," "insulting," and "destructive of personal morale, prevention efforts, and public understanding both of HIV-AIDS and of biomedical science in general. If she did she might face the same scientific shunning Duesberg has.

After all, scientists may be dismissing Duesberg because he is exposing the intricate web of back-slapping that allows them to keep their jobs; scientists who question HIV's relation to AIDS don't seem to be getting much of the billions of federal AIDS research funding. Duesberg takes pleasure in pointing out the intersections of scientific and financial interests; he notes that Gallo, for instance, filed the patent for his virus antibody test the same day Margaret Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services, announced in a government press conference that the HIV retrovirus probably causes AIDS.

This tactic has not made Duesberg many friends; criticizing members of his own department at UC Berkeley hasn't made life easy, either. And if for no other reason than that it reveals why science can no longer be left to researchers with dubious motives, Inventing the AIDS Virus is pivotal.

As Duesberg takes pains to say in our conversation, people see scientists as "truth-seekers who have no other agenda, no conflict of interest. If Clinton says something or the pope says something, we always wonder [about its veracity]. It's not that way with scientists. Some are literally frauds, but we still accept them. Despite this, they are the leading 'AIDS researchers.

Report typos and corrections to: feedback alternet. Is Trump to blame for Jan. Understand the importance of honest news? So do we. Read Comments - Join the Discussion. Want people to get vaccinated? Pay them. Is there 'surprising good news for Democrats' in redistricting?

Not so fast. Because of a multitude of different bacterial, viral, and parasitic opportunistic agents, AIDS is typified by a number of divergent clinical symptoms. As with many lentiviruses, HIV is difficult to demonstrate in the organism, especially in asymptomatic carriers.

Although the rate of infection in peripheral lymphocytes appears to be low, there is an increasing amount of virological and immunological data which help to explain the slow but irreversible failure of the immune defense.